Science & Society : Society, Culture And Humanity Depreciation
....For Dreamers Live For Ever, And A Toiler Dies In A Day...
Sociology. Humanity provides us with knowns of human nature, that alongside empirical claims, allow us to interpret the definition and reason ( Science is definition and reason ) of the nature and causes of this society. Society being the sum of individuals under a authoritarian decision maker.
We know individuals are effective or rational (conditioners). We know they believe in relationships. There are individuals and organisations. Individuals subscibing to organisations for greater satisfaction as they believe in relations; that relations will do this. As such, all subscribe to production and authority understandings.
Society Theory
The demand for effect or profit is satisfied by the self or by the other. There is greater satisfaction through production. We can produce goods and services for ourselves (subsistence) or in return for money (supply a good or service for money) as money is itself a universal instrument of demand, that individuals can use to demand goods themselves (individuals have rational confidence in money). Production is the processing of raw materials into a product as demanded by the consumer. Production requires production understandings - that is an occasionally irrational organisation of individuals for production - as production cannot be approached completely rationally in order for the organisation to function (certainly on a market given competition).
Where production is demanded, the organisation of it is demanded. The agency or social condition is demanded. Individuals either demand rational production (agency) where the focus is the method to production, or demand effective production (social condition) where the focus is the outcome to production.The consumer makes demands on the organisation - the organisation makes demands to satisfy them. Production either demands to be rational, that is demands efficiency, liquidity etc. OR production demands to be effective, demanding cooperation or institution.
Production requires individuals to perform functions in the organisation's operation over and above themselves in the name of efficiency. Aswell as a division of labour (as demanded by efficiency) there is the demand management. Thus the organisation demands management of, aswell as FOPs, knowledge money and labour.
---
The organisation must adhere to the demands of production. The organisation being cooperative (as demanded by an effective product) and remuneration based on morality or equality. However, the organisation can be rational (as demanded by a profitable product) and income remuneration based on productivity.
PRODUCTION MAKES DEMANDS ON ORGANISATION
AGENCY CONDITION (Efficient production, thus rational hierarchy)
DEMAND> PRODUCTION> ORGANIZED PRO-RATIONAL UNDERSTANDING> DIVISION OF LABOUR , HIERARCHY AND DECISON MAKING
SOCIAL CONDITION (Effective production, thus effective cooperation / institution)
DEMAND> PRODUCTION> ORGANIZED EFFECTIVE UNDERSTANDING> COOPERATION / INSTITUTION AND DECISION MAKING
In production, effective types will cost minimize a given effect. The production understanding is effective and people are aware that this means effective remuneration (equality or morality in returns). That is effective people believe we should have an effective understanding for production, and understand that remuneration based on cooperation is necessary to interpret the effect (make effective production happen).
LAW - RELATIONS MAKE A MORE EFFECTIVE PRODUCT (LESS PROFIT TO CONTRIBUTORS THOUGH)
LAW - EFFECTIVENESS DEMANDS COST MINIMISATION OF A GIVEN EFFECT (OBJECTIVE)
INTERPRETATION - PRODUCT REMUNERATION BASED ON EQUALITY OR MORALITY AS FULL COOPERATION OR INSTITUTION IS DEMANDED.
In production, rational types will maximize profit - minimze input and maximize returns. However, the production understanding is pro-rational, and people are aware that this means rational remuneration (inequality - returns reflect individual productivity). That is rational people believe that we should have a pro-rational understanding for production, and realise that remuneration based on productivity and hierarchy is necessary to make production happen. They effectively believe in fair inequality.
FACT - INDIVIDUALS HAVE DIFFERING PRODUCTIVITY
LAW - IRRATIONAL BENEFITS OF MORALITY AND EQUALITY
LAW - RATIONAL TYPES WILL MINIMIZE INPUT AND MAXIMISE RETURNS FROM PRODUCTION (UNLESS VALUE ACTIVITY)
LAW - RATIONALISM DEMANDS THE DIVISION OF LABOUR, MANAGEMENT AND SPECIALISATION IN PRODUCTION
INTERPRETATION - PRODUCT REMUNERATION IS BASED ON PRODUCTIVITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL, AND HIERARCHY FOR MANAGEMENT. EQUALITY AND MORALITY ARE A DISINCENTIVE
The organisation thus makes rational demands, such as division of labour. This means management. This means hierarchy - an occasionally irrational interaction.
(DEMAND OF RATIONAL PRODUCTION)
>INNOVATION> R&D (KNOWLEDGE)
>MARKET ACCESS> MARKETING
>PRODUCTION> OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
ORGANISATION >RAW MATERIAL> RESOURCE PURCHASING AND MANAGEMENT
> LIQUIDITY> FINANCE (MONEY SUPPLY)
> PRODUCTIVITY> HUMAN RESOURCES (LABOUR)
>EFFECT>SOCIAL CONDITIONS
Thus the organisation is demanded to be rational or effective. Thus there is the demand for a division of labour or cooperation. This must be organised - meaning the management of it and thus decision making. The organisation is defined by this decision-making; that is interactive (all individuals have input) or cooercive (one individual is responsible for decision-making). The decisions are in the interest of the organisation (out of belief in it) or are in the interest of the decison maker.
LAW - ORGANISATIONS ARE MADE UP OF INDIVIDUALS
LAW - ORGANISATIONS MUST BE PRODUCTIVE
LAW - INDIVIDUALS HAVE A CONDITIONING RELATION TO EACH OTHER (TO PERFORM THE OPERATION OF THE ORGANISATION),
LAW - ORGANISATIONS ARE INTERACTIVE OR COERCIVE
LAW - INDIVIDUALS ARE CONDITIONERS
INTERPRETATION - ORGANISATIONS MUST HAVE DECISION MAKERS. DECISION MAKERS ARE CONCERNED WITH THE ORGANISATION. ORGANISATIONS ARE EITHER COORDINATED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE DECISION MAKER, OR RAN (ON AGGREGATE) FOR THE BENEFIT OF ITS CONSTITUENTS - IN SATISFYING CONSUMER.
-----
As production is an understanding - there must be equality of status for it (fairness). This equality, this fairness is important to any understanding in production or authority. Individuals have equal entitlement given a qualification of productivity, morality or equality to income from production.
LAW - ORGANISATIONS ARE AN UNDERSTANDING WE HAVE
FACT - ALL INDIVIDUALS MAKE UP PRODUCTION AND AUTHORITY UNDERSTANDING
LAW - WILL IS A CONDITIONER
INTERPRETATION - INDIVIDUALS ARE INTERESTED IN FAIRNESS OR ARE BOUND BY THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO,, AS THEY BELIEVE THIS ULTIMATELY SATISFYS THEM. THEY DEMAND WHAT IS SUBJECTIVELY FAIR. THIS IS TO HAVE THE GREATEST EFFECT, ULTIMATELY, IN TERMS OF RATIONAL OR EFFECTIVE SELF-INTEREST.
Where the production understanding is interactive or coercive (slavery) then the authority understanding is cooercive or interactive.
To best satisfy individual self-interest, the production understanding has a hierarchy for decision making. Rationally, this hierarchy is based on productivity for the organisation. There is an understanding to profit maximise labour. The individual is subordinate to another.
The 9 to 5 Understanding. We interpret the effect of a business,
that is occasionally irrational to any one individual.
As hierarchy is occasionally irrational to the subordinate - but this hierarchy based on individual productivity, then the capitalist understanding is seen as fair to rational agents. The understanding facilitating productivity - thus rational self-interest. The rational individual realises whether the organisation is efficient, is productive, or not.
However, as relations are essential in production for effective value, then profit-maximisation of them is exploitation of people away from what they should be doing. The individuals' or teams' achievement or failure defines productivity, this resource should be put to production for effective value - not the profit for an individual as this is disenfranchising them from the opportunity for effective value. The profit produced is invested rationally, not in effective value (the true demand - for example , why did the majority of the UK vote labour in 1997, at the expense of profitable goods on markets). Capitalism is not fair to effective agents. The understanding conducive to exploitation - thus robbing the majority of investment in effective value.
EFFECTIVE AGENTS> CAPITALISM> ACHIEVEMENT DEFINES PRODUCTIVITY> INVESTMENT OF PROFIT N PROFITABLE GOODS>
-------
(EFFECTORS NOT SATISFIED, CAPITALIST IS SATISFIED)
LAW - EFFECTIVE CONDITIONERS ( UNDERSTAND FROM INTERACTION )
LAW - RATIONAL CONDITIONERS ( REALISE FROM SELF )
LAW - CAPITALIST PRODUCTION UNDERSTANDING
INTERPRETATION - RATIONALE OF EFFICIENCY ( THUS PRODUCTIVITY, THUS DETERMINANTS OF PRODUCTIVITY (RESPONISIBILITY AND RISK-TAKING) ) APPLIED TO ASSIGNING STATUS ( FOR INCOME FROM PRODUCTION ) TO CERTAIN RELATIONS TO PRODUCTION. THE STATUS OF HIERARCHY DUE TO DEMANDS OF PRODUCTIVITY IS KNOWN TO RATIONAL TYPES. EFFECTIVE CONDITIONERS BELIEVE IN RELATIONSHIPS - STATUS OF EQUALITY SHOULD DETERMINE INCOME DISTRIBUTION. THUS HIERARCHY IS SEEN AS EXPLOITATIVE. CAPITALISM IS EFFICIENT FOR DEMANDS OF HIERARCHY, BUT INEFFECTIVE IN SATISFYING EFFECTOR'S DEMANDS
Status is assigned to efficient and productive individuals - due to them being beneficial in an understanding.
Individuals may demand ( remunerate ) labour, capital and land for production. Labour thus submits to a hierarchical understanding - producing for the individual, subordinate to their interests.
For example, the phrase "...at the end of the day...." ( that is, the end of the working day) implies that fairness is important and this is applied to income distribution in terms of productivity, equality or morality. The understanding of capitalism ( over and above self-interest ) is realised to be fair by rational agents. That is as some are more productive than others, then they have status in capitalist income distribution. The understanding is not fair to effectors as it robs us of the opportunity to produce effect.
-----
Power is decision. The decision to invest is in the hands of the individual owner of assets, liquid or otherwise. The capitalist understanding is founded on private capital ownership - thus capital accumulation. The decision to invest is not democratic, capitalism is a rational system based on freedom, but effective conditioners are disenfranchised from the product of their labour.
The individual may own capital. The capitalist individual employs people for productivity with it. That is, given this power the capitalists rational and effective self-interest lies in cost-minimisation for investment in further profit. The will of the work-force doesn't matter. The forced contribution of taxation for the financing of interpreted-effects (social conditions) is by and large un-economical to the capitalist (costs outweigh benefits to him) but of greater benefit to the work-force (the majority).
Effective conditioners would demand a social condition, with cooperative investment in effect. They are disenfranchised in capitalism from what they demand - effectiveness. For example, effective conditioners will demand effective goods , but investment will be for profit.
ACHIEVEMENT DRIVES PRODUCTION> PROFIT ON PRODUCTION> INVESTMENT IN PROFIT> WRONG SUPPLY AND WRONG DEMAND ON LABOUR
CAPITAL ACCUMULATION THROUGH PROFIT MAX. (THUS DEMAND ON LABOUR MARKET) + EFFECTIVE DEMANDS = DISENFRANCHISED
The achievement or failure of human resources (management and labour) determines productivity. The profit on output, under the discretion of the decision maker is invested in more profit, creating demands on the labour market. Where effective conditioners are in the majority they work mis-allocated from true effective demands and they are not supplied with effective goods on the market. They are disenfranchised.
----
Decisions organize production for profit maximisation or effectiveness. There is the demand decision by the individual, and the supply decision of the organisations decision making function.
The shape of society is defined by the satisfaction of economic demands. The demand is defined by human nature or false awareness and the supply is defined by the factors of production. Culture for example can impact on society - informal awareness as to the value of goods being satisfied through the coordination of the factors of production.
That is on the demand-side, consumption to satisfy effective and rational self interests (what ever they may be - including family and religious practice )) and the supply side, production by an agency or social condition.
The Commodity. Conditioners demand effective or profitable goods from the other.
Society places effective or rational demands on production. Society determines demand, demand defining production (supply).
The reason of society is the reason of this production (economic thus necessarilly social satisfaction ). As there is authority for independence then decisions in this society are made independently. Reasons are largely independent in capitalism. What interpreted effects there are , are by free agents ( charity, religion ).
FACT - INDEPENDENT MARKET DECISIONS
LAW - CAPITALIST UNDERSTANDING FOR PRODUCTION
LAW - HUMAN NATURE OR FALSE AWARENESS DEFINES DEMAND
LAW - FACTORS OF PRODUCTION DEFINE SUPPLY
LAW - AGENCIES REQUIRE A COHERANT STATE AUTHORITY FOR SOCIETY TO BE RATIONAL TO THE INDIVIDUAL
INTERPRETATION - SOCIETY TAKES A SUBJECTIVELY PROFITABLE OR EFFECTIVE FORM - GIVEN POWER. INDEPENDENT HUMAN NATURES, FALSE AWARENESSES AND THE DEMANDS OF PRODUCTION DEFINE THE SHAPE OF SOCIETY, AS DOES THE INEQUALITY IN THE ABILITY TO MAKE THIS DEMAND OR SUPPLY.
SOCIETY IS DEFINED AS AN UNDERSTANDING FOR INDEPENDENT MARKET PRODUCTION (CAPITALISM ), AND A SOCIAL CONDITION TO UPHOLD IT ( STATE ), AND RESULTANT INTERPRETED EFFECTS BY INDIVIDUALS. DECISIONS ARE INDEPENDENT AND CONDITIONAL - THAT IS SUBJECTIVE, THUS REASONS FOR SPECIFIC SOCIAL FORMS ARE INDIVIDUAL. SPECIFIC DEMANDS MEAN DIFFERENT SOCIAL PRODUCTION FORMS ( AGENCIES ), BUT THEIR METHODS ACCORD WITH THE CAPITALIST UNDERSTANDING.
The rational or effective demands of the individual are subjective. Society should reflect this subjective demand - however not entirely. There are many factors to the ability to demand, including income distribution. Income inequality means society reflects the demands of the productive and or powerful. The demand decision is almost independent of the other , the supply decision is almost independent of the workforce. This means (by chance) the capitalist has a demand on the shape of society.
The decision maker (owner of capital) decides on income distribution due to the demands of a pro-rational organisation , ostensibly justified by liberal ideology. This power means inequality in income derived from production. There is also differing natural endowments of productivity - meaning income inequality. Also, the capitalist produces for profit when there majority may make effective demands, and the understanding it self , the organisation itself , may opertate more irrationally to the workforce than the owner ( for example , a new factory may be next to a road for profit, but the opposite side of a city to the workforce who bare the cost of commuting. This is where the workforce may be effective and want to work at the factory, the labour market not correcting this irrational cost).
----
Individuals may best satisfy their effective or rational self-interest by making decisions, Accordingly, individuals demand that decisions taken about agency and social conditions (decisions about interpreted effects ) are in their interest. We independently make decisions or interpret the role for a decision maker to make decisions for the conditions. We thus interpret a state to uphold an authority over the individual and social-agency conditions - and satisfy the individuals' interest and their interest in the condition. The state understanding for authority - formely known as a social contract upholds the satisfactory performance of the condition to the individual. Society is the realm of individual decisions on one side, and state decisions on the other.
The social contract ( Hobbes - 1651 ) is an understanding between the individual and the state. We interpret resources for the effect of authority.
Democracy is the authority of the will of the majority. Where the majority are effective then there is forced contribution by all to social conditions. In communsim , rational types are not free to profit maximize, they must conform to an understanding which they dont wont to do, remunerated unfairly only to be unable to buy what they want. Democracy ensures the greatest satisfaction to both, in short a balance of investment in rational profit and interpreted effect; this balance determined by a number of factors (practical economic concerns, the level of humanity, etc).
----
ORGANISATION> DECISION MAKING> INTERESTS> ASSOCIATION OR COMPETITION UNDERSTANDINGS
That is rational conditioners demand laws and policies upholding agencies. Effective conditioners demand laws and policies upholding social conditions. They both demand favourable decisions by the conditions. The individual has to associate or compete for these decisions, These associations are constituted by individuals with joint interests / reasons, that serve to satisfy the individual. Politics can take many forms - but it is the arena for associative authority over decision making by social conditions generally - for the satisfaction of different conditioners, different believers.
Culture Theory
In the late 19th century the desire for progress and development was at its height1. NeoClassical economics was the false knowledge of the time promoting consideration for the consumer in government policy, as the best way to develop. Consumerism thus impacted on law and policy in the 19th century (free trade, free markets) starting with the repeal of the corn laws and later with the reduction of tariffs on imports. Free trade was to deliver peace, with mutual consumer satisfaction being rational.
Along side government policy was business policy. There was proportionately more investment in marketing; advertisement and arcades with shop displays became the norm. This development of business and government policy coincided with the development of income for some, in particular disposable incomes. (Demand for consumer goods over and above further common goods).
The culture of consumerism coincided with the development of new technology and labour-saving devices. However, under conditions of capitalism where there is great inequality - the culuture spurring demand, relatively low income for the majority, and relatively high price of consumer goods meant rationalisation and humanity-understanding depreciation. That is in capitalism, particularly the lower middle class generally (given income) worked hard on markets to afford effective goods and moved away from understandings (business practice - what Marx termed class consciousness). This culture contrasted with the growth of liberalism and socialism. Inequality was due to productivity and this realisation led to a work-ethic for effective goods.
There was a growing culture of consumerism. There was the invention of new technology. There was ever growing inequality. This meant pressure on incomes. This meant humanity depreciation yet demand for effective goods - that is people must be economising for purposes of effective consumption.
FACT - AVAILABILITY OF HIGH PRICED EFFECTIVE GOODS
FACT - INEQUALITY OF INCOMES
INTERPRETATION - HIGHER PRICES AND LOWER MONEY STOCKS MEAN HUMANITY DEPRECIATION (CETERIS PARIBUS)
The absence of knowledge of understandings for effective value, meant working hard and rationalisation.
FACT - Humanity depreciation (will thus rational)
FACT - Disproportionate Increase in the demand for effective goods
FACT - inequality in goods (with status)
LAW - Will is a conditioner from the self, or of status and truth
INTERPRETATION - Individuals demand effective goods for status, when their human-nature is rational. We demand goods with status, rather than be true to the self and realise profit. This is an effective demand, an effective self-interest that cannot be due to humanity so is a false awareness as to the status of positives (culture); meaning individuals interpret goods rather than truly satisfy the self2. We interpret the effect of status rather than realise profit, when rational.
Thus along side the growth in inequality, was a disproportionate growth in effective goods (valuable compared to average incomes). This is interpreted to mean will is a conditioner of the status of effective goods.
This is individuals subscribing to an informal-awareness as to the value of certain goods ( culture ) where we demand effective goods irrationally (not being themselves - rational ). This false awareness means maximising effect over satisfying our true self (feelings), that is maximising status over being true (demanding profitable goods is true to the self).
SO, where successful people were effective, others saw these new products were just not affordable, so people got effective (but to save money), people got sorting / economising. Thus a culture emerged due to this humanity depreciation, invention of technology and general prevalence of effective goods, a culture; an informal awareness of status in consumption.
This was sorted-status culture. For example, Burberry was sorted. Gold was sorted. Military prowess was (in Europe) “sorted”. Its not even satisfying, its just “sorted-out”.
Richard Wagner - ("Sorted-passion" style of the late 19th Century)
The second world war ended “sorted status” in Europe and determined humanity appreciation through the social success of the war. That is the irrational benefits of fighting (saving each others' lives) that was ultimately successful appreciated relations. in Britain, Clement attlee and the Labour party rose with democratic socialism and Keynesian demand management economics coming in. The 1944 education act was enacted, the NHS was established and a comprehensive welfare state came into being. The success of this meant further humanity appreciation ("the way people are" as understood by successful social conditions - irrational benefits from others. That is, someone irrationally benefiting another would appreciate a belief in an understanding between them).
This meant a spirit that lasted until 1980 (circa), where with a new generation humanity depreciated from drugs (that and resultant crime breached our understanding), breakdown in the family and failure of social conditions. That is state enterprises grew overly inefficient and unions became self-interested - social conditions became too irrational to the individual, thus depreciating the understanding (a loss of faith in public services)3. Rational approaches came to dominate - the concept of the rational cognitive machine. Religious practice and socialist association has diminished in recent times. Also, came the knowledge that democratic socialism and conservatism doesnt work, meaning many are in false awareness.
Also, due to ever growing inequality, the prevalence of luxury goods - of effective goods generally - sorted-status is making a return.
An example is china where demand for luxuries is growing faster than average incomes. Growth in inequality with huge demand for luxuries could mean sorted-status culture. In these graphs it is noted inequality of income with a disproportionate increase in electronics demand (many are economising for electronics).
Also it means a booming black market. As incomes rise for the productive, luxury demand rises establishing a culture that others fit into through economising - furthering growth in electronics demand.
This culture is popularly identified as status anxiety. Either way it is defined by individuals interpreting resources for status through economisation, as opposed to satisfying our feelings.
China is adhering to the understanding that certain goods have status, rather than being content4. Inequality drives expectations - thus a desire to sort out status. This culture is thus derived from capitalism and only replacing that system will see it end.
Works.
Nazis only care about methods, not outcomes. They didnt care too much about what they did (murder), as to how they did it (operation).
There is diminishing marginal returns to agricultural produce (milk), certainly compared to consumer durables (electronics) given income rises.
“Playing it that way” is un-favored in business practice, that is a focus on efficiency and cost minimisation is counterproductive. Better off being value effective, and keeping subsequent costs down rather than trying to keep everything efficient and sorted ( Taylorism ).
The right focus on equality of opportunity ( method ), the left focus on equality of outcome.
The right wing favour rational methods in academics, left wing are plural.
Sociologists know we have different values - many psychologists argue we dont as we would be killing each other.
In religous studies, they use hermeneutics for interpretation
In economics, there is mainstream deductive (including neoliberal) economics and heterodox (mostly socialist) economics
In sociology, there are interpretivists ( observational ) and theres positivists ( statistical ). There is the adherence to a structure in society ( understanding ) or a subscription to human action (rational).
In history we interpret evidence, or analyse statistics
In psychology - On one side there’s analytical psychology with the interpretation of dreams etc promising a deeper understanding, Freudian psychoanalysis where theres understanding through case study and on the other side, cognitive science. Also according to Carl Jung there are rational types (thinking or feeling) and irrational types (sense or intuition)
In psychiatry, theres’ assessment of a subjects’ thought processess for a condition ( is the patient “rational”), assessment for singular or generic (social) causal explanations and understanding of symptoms or events to interpret a narrative.5
In philosophy theres analytical (emphasis on science) and continental (interpretive) philosophy
In legal jurisprudence, the right favour rule of law and the left interpret through discretion.
Teenagers smoke in school, irrationally due to it being seen as cool - they interpret resources for the effect of smoking, irrationally, due to a culture being seen as true.
Europeans sympathize with the idea of equality (understanding), Americans analyze the realities of communism, as they are rational and analytical due to crime etc, and liberal false knowledge. Europeans complain about inequality and are concerned about ineffective public services, Americans are concerned with a loss in freedom and unemployment.
Where countries have low crime, then socialism is popular. Although socialist countries appear moral6 they under-perform economically (Wales compared to England). That is from the extremely irrational benefits of dangerous industry such as mining (risking their lives for each other - the effective benefit of having your life saved) and the irrational benefits of successful democratic socialism ( the effective benefit of an NHS ) then Wales has a strong belief in an understanding.
The Soviets employed instrumental reasoning (equality through bullets) while capitalist countries make efficiency an objective without regard to outcome
Failure and offence forces us to be rational about things - that is with a restricted income, a restricted budget, we are rational with money
People from poverty are prone to crime (less understanding of consequence) and are less understanding generally (school work).
Normally when theres a recession people tend to vote for right-wing parties, while when times are good we vote left wing.
The military drill recruits - so that "sorting-out" is second nature. This is usually keeping things simple ( simple and sorted-out ). Simplicity is efficiency in the mind, thus is rational to cope with stress, and other psychological factors (fear).
Unions are an understanding we have (for the effective benefit of job security). Some rational types undercut strikes for private gain.
Adolf Hitler only understood what he saw - he argued with his generals about the reality at the front through out the war.
The left appear to favour a "state" understanding - the right rational markets.
1 The theory of the leisure society -
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/833/833-h/833-h.htm
2 There are false awarenesses that, aswell as the human nature relationship understandings, define interpreted effects. One such false awareness is culture; dictating interpreted effects we usually adhere to. We interpreted the effect of “sorted-out” (in order - effective status considering aesthetics) rather than be true to ourselves, due to a false awareness of the value of things.
3 http://blogs.reuters.com/chrystia-freeland/2011/08/05/what-happens-when-citizens-lose-faith-in-government/
4 https://www.weekinchina.com/2015/02/status-anxiety/
5 https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/95131
6 https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2012/06/24/the-more-capitalism-the-more-crime-the-more-socialism-the-less-crime/